<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Andreas Kraus: C#, ASP.NET, Silverlight &#187; SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/category/seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog</link>
	<description>News, Tutorials and Codesnippets about C#, ASP.NET- Silverlight</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 15:51:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Registered a domain and no clue what to do with it?</title>
		<link>http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/registered-a-domain-and-no-clue-what-to-do-with-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/registered-a-domain-and-no-clue-what-to-do-with-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Aug 2006 14:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andreas.kraus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web/Net]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/registered-a-domain-and-no-clue-what-to-do-with-it/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sometimes I&#8217;m just registering domains because I think that specific domain name could be worth something. However, I don&#8217;t always have an idea for them. A good advise is to check the domain with different extensions. Let&#8217;s say you registered my-domain.de. Now check out my-domain.com, my-domain.net, my-domain.org, etc. and see what they did with that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes I&#8217;m just registering domains because I think that specific domain name could be worth something. However, I don&#8217;t always have an idea for them.</p>
<p>A good advise is to check the domain with different extensions. Let&#8217;s say you registered my-domain.de. Now check out my-domain.com, my-domain.net, my-domain.org, etc. and see what they did with that specific domain.</p>
<p>That might help you with building an idea for your domain!</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-1056834548297113";
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 15;
google_ad_format = "468x15_0ads_al_s";
google_ad_channel = "";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/registered-a-domain-and-no-clue-what-to-do-with-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO Facts and Myths &#8211; W3C Validation, Dynamic Pages, Duplicate Content</title>
		<link>http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/seo-facts-and-myths-w3c-validation-dynamic-pages-duplicate-content/</link>
		<comments>http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/seo-facts-and-myths-w3c-validation-dynamic-pages-duplicate-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 10:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andreas.kraus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/seo-facts-and-myths-w3c-validation-dynamic-pages-duplicate-content/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some interesting facts about SEO taken from Matt Cutt&#8217;s latest video sessions: When you launch a new website, rather launch it with a few thousands pages instead of millions. After that, add pages in a healthy period of time. Be sure to have unique pages! Don&#8217;t worry about W3C validation too much. It&#8217;s good to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some interesting facts about SEO taken from Matt Cutt&#8217;s latest video sessions:</p>
<ul>
<li>When you launch a new website, rather launch it with a few thousands pages instead of millions. After that, add pages in a healthy period of time.</li>
<li>Be sure to have unique pages!</li>
<li>Don&#8217;t worry about W3C validation too much. It&#8217;s good to validate but it&#8217;s <strong>not necessary</strong>. Usability and how the pag looks should be your first thing to worry about. Personally I never really cared about W3C validation because in my opinion they&#8217;re living in the past.</li>
<li>Dynamic pages with query strings are crawled by most searchengines just one link deeper. If you have to use dynamic query string pages be sure to keep your parameters short and avoid long numbers as they might be treated as session ids.</li>
<li>Try to use mod_rewrite or simliar techniques to make your urls more friendly and readable</li>
<li>GEOIP targeting is not treated as cloaking, however, you should <strong>never</strong> treat the googlebot or any other searchengine bot in a special way. Cloaking means to show different content to searchengine bots than to users.</li>
<li>Google does a lot of duplicate content detections. There are several forms of duplicate content, like full duplicates or just near duplicates. Be sure to write as unique pages as possible and you won&#8217;t get into trouble.</li>
</ul>
<p>That&#8217;s a short summary of what I written down while listening to the videos. </p>
<p><script type="text/javascript"><!--
google_ad_client = "pub-1056834548297113";
google_ad_width = 468;
google_ad_height = 15;
google_ad_format = "468x15_0ads_al_s";
google_ad_channel = "";
//-->
</script>
<script type="text/javascript"
  src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
</script></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/seo-facts-and-myths-w3c-validation-dynamic-pages-duplicate-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dropped Link-Vault</title>
		<link>http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/dropped-link-vault/</link>
		<comments>http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/dropped-link-vault/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 08:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andreas.kraus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/dropped-link-vault/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I finally decided to drop Link-Vault, I removed the code from every website I maintain. Reasons for that: The LinkVault website is banned from Google I see lots of auctions about selling Vaultage on eBay (by the admins) The admins are not responding on the official forum anymore People say Google decreases the value of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finally decided to drop Link-Vault, I removed the code from every website I maintain.</p>
<p>Reasons for that:</p>
<ul>
<li>The LinkVault website is banned from Google</li>
<li>I see lots of auctions about selling Vaultage on eBay (by the admins)</li>
<li>The admins are not responding on the official forum anymore</li>
<li>People say Google decreases the value of sites displaying Link-Vault Links</li>
</ul>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t sure at first if I really gonna drop them, but in the meantime things have even gone worse than before.</p>
<p>Personally I suggest to drop Link-Vault. In long-term your site may experience penalities if you still use it.</p>
<p><!--adsense--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/dropped-link-vault/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google supports META NOODP tag</title>
		<link>http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/google-supports-meta-noodp-tag/</link>
		<comments>http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/google-supports-meta-noodp-tag/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 12:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andreas.kraus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/google-supports-meta-noodp-tag/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Matt Cutts writes: In some circumstances, Google uses descriptions from the Open Directory Project as the title and snippet for a web result; this tag lets you opt out of the ODP title and description. This can be pretty annoying if you want your chosen title to appear in the Searchengines and someone else submitted [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt Cutts writes:</p>
<blockquote><p>
In some circumstances, Google uses descriptions from the Open Directory Project as the title and snippet for a web result; this tag lets you opt out of the ODP title and description.
</p></blockquote>
<p>This can be pretty annoying if you want your chosen title to appear in the Searchengines and someone else submitted your site into dmoz with a totally or slightly different title.</p>
<p><!--adsense#singelad--></p>
<pre><code>&lt;meta name=â€?robotsâ€? content=â€?noodpâ€?&gt;</code></pre>
<p>So that&#8217;s indeed a very cool meta tag and you should use it by default, just to be safe.</p>
<p><!--adsense--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/google-supports-meta-noodp-tag/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Pirate Bay making over 20,000 a day</title>
		<link>http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/the-pirate-bay-making-over-e20000-a-day/</link>
		<comments>http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/the-pirate-bay-making-over-e20000-a-day/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2006 11:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andreas.kraus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web/Net]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/the-pirate-bay-making-over-e20000-a-day/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The file sharing site The Pirate Bay are set to be making over $25328 a day, with single day advertisements costing 20,000. The past four months the Swedish company Eastpoint Media have sold ads for The Pirate Bay for an average of 60,000 per month, according to sales manager Luar BusÃ³. The police raid on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The file sharing site The Pirate Bay are set to be making over $25328 a day, with single day advertisements costing 20,000.</p>
<p>The past four months the Swedish company Eastpoint Media have sold ads for The Pirate Bay for an average of 60,000 per month, according to sales manager Luar BusÃ³. The police raid on 31 May resulted in even more visitors to the site and prices for ads went up accordingly.</p>
<p>&#8216;The biggest ads today cost 20,000 and so far we&#8217;ve sold four&#8217;, says Luar.</p>
<p>Eastpoint sell ads for The Pirate Bay in the Scandinavian market. File sharing is most widespread in Sweden where many people have broadband. But The Pirate Bay runs in twenty five different languages and gets visitors from all corners of the planet. </p>
<p>I expected that Priate Bay probably achieves some nice earnings but I didn&#8217;t expect it to be that high. Not bad.</p>
<p><!--adsense--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/the-pirate-bay-making-over-e20000-a-day/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fake Forum Statistics</title>
		<link>http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/fake-forum-statistics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/fake-forum-statistics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 09:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andreas.kraus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web/Net]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/fake-forum-statistics/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Obviously it does help when starting a new forum! In the past I used to register fake accounts myself on new forums I created and started posting. Nowadays it&#8217;s a little bit easier. Most forums run vBulletin, so if you run vBulletin, too, there&#8217;s already a pre-built hack for you: Fake Community Statistics Here&#8217;s an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously it <strong>does</strong> help when starting a new forum! In the past I used to register fake accounts myself on new forums I created and started posting. Nowadays it&#8217;s a little bit easier. Most forums run vBulletin, so if you run vBulletin, too, there&#8217;s already a pre-built hack for you:</p>
<p><!--adsense#singelad--><br />
<a href="http://www.vbulletin.org/forum/showthread.php?t=115661" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Fake Community Statistics</a></p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an example of what it does:</p>
<blockquote><p>
Total registered members: 5<br />
Added amount: 100<br />
Forumhome now shows instead of 5:<br />
Total registered members: 105</p>
<p>Of course, if a new member registeres it will be 106.
</p></blockquote>
<p>This is helping newly created forums to get off the ground. However, my manual method also included manual posting which is not part of this hack. So you better combine this hack with posting some threads here and there.</p>
<p>I made a custom solution for the Invision Power Board, if you&#8217;re interested leave a comment.</p>
<p>Unfortunately there are so many forums in the internet that in most cased you won&#8217;t succeed with your forum without pushing it in the first place. Noone will register on a ghost forum, that&#8217;s a fact.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m planning on releasing a custom written script for an automated posting routine soon. With this script you will be able to feed your forum with postings in a matter of seconds, based on individual topic sources. Check back every now and then to find out when it&#8217;s being released.</p>
<p>..have a nice day!</p>
<p><!--adsense--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/fake-forum-statistics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CommunityServer bug with URL Rewriting?</title>
		<link>http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/communityserver-bug-with-url-rewriting/</link>
		<comments>http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/communityserver-bug-with-url-rewriting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2006 07:48:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andreas.kraus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/communityserver-bug-with-url-rewriting/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There might be some kind of problems with the URL Rewriting in ASP.NET v2. CommunityServer is affected by this as you can see on this Screenshot: click for img This screenshot also shows you where to get this Tool &#8211; Fiddler . First I made some tests with a site developed by us, we use [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There might be some kind of problems with the URL Rewriting in ASP.NET v2. CommunityServer is affected by this as you can see on this Screenshot:</p>
<div align="center">
<a class="imagelink" href="http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/wp-content/uploads/2006/07/community.jpg" title="Community Server">click for img</a>
</div>
<p>This screenshot also shows you where to get this Tool &#8211; Fiddler <img src='http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>First I made some tests with a site developed by us, we use custom URL Rewriting in the global.asax and everything runs fine, that&#8217;s why I&#8217;m not sure if this is really an ASP.NET v2 issue as it&#8217;s being claimed to be one by a couple of people.</p>
<p>Later on you see the CommunityServer Request and the possible bug: A 302 redirect instead of a 200 redirect which is very bad for SearchEngines. Due to this fact your site may drop out of most SearchEngines. Matt Cutts blogged on this, too: <a href="http://www.mattcutts.com/blog/asp-net-2-and-url-rewriting-sometimes-harmful/" target="_blank">ASP.NET 2 + url rewriting considered harmful in some cases</a>.</p>
<p>Anyone else got problems with a 302 Redirect when using URL Rewriting?</p>
<p>We are using <strong>Context.RewritePath</strong> to perform our URL Rewriting and didn&#8217;t run into any problems so far.</p>
<p><!--adsense--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/communityserver-bug-with-url-rewriting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My favorite SEO Tool</title>
		<link>http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/my-favorite-seo-tool/</link>
		<comments>http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/my-favorite-seo-tool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 16:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andreas.kraus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/my-favorite-seo-tool/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This URL is in my opinion pretty unique because of it&#8217;s great performance and very usuable tools. I&#8217;m using it for months for all kind of SEO related stuff. What you find there is: Link Value (pretty good to check if it&#8217;s worth to make a Link Exchange with someone) Analysis / Linkpop (amount of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This URL is in my opinion pretty unique because of it&#8217;s great performance and very usuable tools. I&#8217;m using it for months for all kind of SEO related stuff.</p>
<p>What you find there is:</p>
<ul>
<li>Link Value (pretty good to check if it&#8217;s worth to make a Link Exchange with someone)</li>
<li>Analysis / Linkpop (amount of backlinks, indexed sites, Google PageRank)</li>
<li>Domain Popularity (shows you all backlinks for the given domain, including up to 10 subpages per backlinking domain, host IP and Google PageRank)</li>
<li>Multi Pagerank (Great for checking other Datacenters for your PR &#8211; e.g. in case of an upcoming PR update)</li>
<li>.. and lots of other useful tools</li>
</ul>
<p>I decided to share this gem with all my blog readers, so here you go:<br />
<a href="http://www.linkvendor.com/" target="_blank">LinkVendor &#8211; Professional SEO Tools</a></p>
<p><!--adsense--></p>
<p>Antother very useful Tool is to avoid Google&#8217;s duplicate content penalty: <a href="http://www.webmasterlabor.com/tools/checker" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Duplicate Content Checker</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/my-favorite-seo-tool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google PageRank update rolled back</title>
		<link>http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/google-pagerank-update-rolled-back/</link>
		<comments>http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/google-pagerank-update-rolled-back/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 13:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andreas.kraus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/google-pagerank-update-rolled-back/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Too bad, the changes were not persitant. Anyway, expect an update in the near future. In case you were lucky enough to check your ranks yesterday: It looks like they were pretty authentic, I think those numbers will go live with the full update. If you weren&#8217;t satisfied with your new PageRank &#8211; now you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too bad, the changes were not persitant. Anyway, expect an update in the near future. In case you were lucky enough to check your ranks yesterday: It looks like they were pretty authentic, I think those numbers will go live with the full update.</p>
<p>If you weren&#8217;t satisfied with your new PageRank &#8211; now you got a little more time left for trying to improve your ranking! <img src='http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><!--adsense--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/google-pagerank-update-rolled-back/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google PageRank update in progress!</title>
		<link>http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/google-pagerank-update-in-progress-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/google-pagerank-update-in-progress-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 10:00:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>andreas.kraus</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/google-pagerank-update-in-progress-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just checked several Datacenters and many of my new sites got finally PageRank! As of now, these Datacenters carry the new PageRank already: 64.233.179.104 64.233.185.99 64.233.185.104 64.233.179.99 64.233.171.99 64.233.171.147 64.233.171.104 There are several Multi PageRank checkers out there which make it easier for you to aquire your new PageRank, just google them. Time to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just checked several Datacenters and many of my new sites got finally PageRank! As of now, these Datacenters carry the new PageRank already:</p>
<p><!--adsense#singelad--></p>
<ul>
<li>64.233.179.104</li>
<li>64.233.185.99</li>
<li>64.233.185.104</li>
<li>64.233.179.99</li>
<li>64.233.171.99</li>
<li>64.233.171.147</li>
<li>64.233.171.104</li>
</ul>
<p>There are several Multi PageRank checkers out there which make it easier for you to aquire your new PageRank, just google them.</p>
<p>Time to go and check your new Rankings! <img src='http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><!--adsense--></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andreas-kraus.net/blog/google-pagerank-update-in-progress-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
